Litigation

An enviable track record in CCMA, Bargaining Council & Labour Court litigation

Training

Customised training solutions crafted to ensure knowledge and skills transfer

Consulting

Our accomplished team of professional consultants render practical, sound labour law solutions

http://www.tonyhealy.co.za/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/250372litigation_banner.jpg http://www.tonyhealy.co.za/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/906307training_banner.jpg http://www.tonyhealy.co.za/components/com_gk2_photoslide/images/thumbm/807581consulting_banner2.jpg
JOHANNESBURG · DURBAN · CAPE TOWN · PRETORIA · STELLENBOSCH
Saturday, 18 November 2017

The CCMA has been a part of the employment law landscape for almost fifteen years and, as are Bargaining Councils, it is tasked with the adjudication of many employment disputes if and when conciliation fails, the vast majority of which are related to alleged unfair dismissal.

Arbitration hearings are conducted around the country on a daily basis in a growing number of CCMA offices countrywide. Its a win/lose process.

As much as labour arbitration is not conducted with quite the same degree of legality as is the case in Magistrate and High Courts, users will tell you that it is still a process which requires a keen understanding of such subjects as the law of evidence, the burden of proof, and even protocols, to a degree.

Certain basic principles must be fully understood.

To begin with, arbitration cases are hearings de novo. This means that the arbitration hearing hears the case afresh, and is not a review of the employers original decision.

Employers are not required to ensure that dismissal decisions are perfect, but they must be fair and reasonable.

Arbitrators are entitled to conduct arbitration hearings in a manner that the Commissioner considers appropriate in order to determine the dispute fairly and quickly. As such, commissioners may, for example, depart from the normal rules of evidence (such as the admission of hearsay evidence).

In practice, Commissioners vary markedly in style; some will say very little, whilst others will assume a far more inquisitorial role.

Cases must be proved on the balance of probabilities which, put simply, means that it must be proved that the employee is probably guilty.

The relationship between proof and evidence must be grasped. Cases are proved utilising evidence such as eye witnesses, documents, photographs and CCTV footage. Add to this the so-called argument (persuasive closing summary statements and submissions), and the proof (evidence and argument) is complete.

All cases are, at least potentially, assessed on the basis of two types of fairness. To begin with, the employer must prove that an employee was dismissed in a procedurally fair manner. In short, this obligates the employer to comply with the LRA Code of Good Practice: Misconduct & Incapacity (LRA Schedule 8).

This includes granting the employee sufficient time to prepare for a disciplinary hearing normally no less than 48 hours) and granting the employee the right to be represented and call witnesses etc, in the course of presenting a defence.

Dismissals must also be substantively fair fair reason, sufficient proof, consistently applied and an appropriate (ie: not unduly harsh) sanction.

Substantive fairness is invariably assessed by Commissioners in accordance with a factual inquiry into whether or not the employee contravened rule, was the rule in question valid/reasonable and was the employee aware of the rule, or could they be expected to have reasonably had knowledge of the rule?

Witnesses are subjected to an evidence-in-chief, cross-examination, re-examination line of questioning.

Follow Tony on Twitter at @tony_healy

First published in The Star Workplace on 18 February 2015